S.D. New York· 8/15/2002
United States v. Haqq
Citations
- 213 F. Supp. 2d 383
- 2002 WL 1770788
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an “exclusive possessory interest” is unnecessary to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buchwald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,715×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 1,221×
- Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court· 1998-11-18· cited 766×
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Ex Rel. AdministratorSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 341×
- United States v. John M. Haydel, Jr., A/K/A \Ice Cream\ and \Mugsy\Fifth Circuit· 1981-07-08· cited 165×
- United States v. Riad Youssef RahmeSecond Circuit· 1987-03-05· cited 115×
- United States v. Kendall IsomSecond Circuit· 1978-11-29· cited 72×
- United States v. Samad HaqqSecond Circuit· 2002-01-17· cited 34×
Other cases named United States v. Haqq
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.