United States v. Hanjuan Jin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “saying ‘something nasty’” does not constitute protected speech
• finding that plaintiff's allegations “that defendants violated his constitutional rights” with a “tacked on” and “generic” allegation that “those violations were committed pursuant to a conspiracy” is “insufficient to make out a § 1985 claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).