United States v. Hammel, Riglander & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An objection on one ground does not allow a party to argue on appeal that the evidence should have been excluded on different grounds.”
• “Without an objection and a proper request for relief, the matter is waived and will receive no consideration on appeal absent plain error.”
• deposition testimony of plaintiff who brought prior suit against manufacturer for defect in same product admissible
• “The harmful effect of the improperly admitted evidence is reduced where there is substantial evidence in the record beyond the evidence improperly admitted to support the jury’s decision.”
• standard of review for Rule 804(b)(1) decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).