United States v. Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asking whether government buyer adequately informed contractor of discrepancy between government estimate of required manhours and manhours allocated to job in contractor’s bid
• “this is a case of mutual fault to the extent that neither party is entitled to recover on the claims asserted against the other”
• appellant provided no evidence or testimony that a mistake was made in the preparation of the proposal
• contractor was not entitled to reformation based on mistake in bid where mistake was a result of a “mistake in judgment”
• contractor made judgment that man-hours which were sufficient for one contract would also be sufficient for second contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).