United States v. Halon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the specifications were clear, and therefore controlling
• “Admissions made in the course of judicial proceedings are substitutes for, and dispense with, the actual proof of facts.”
• “[Cjontract should be interpreted in a manner which gives meaning to all its parts.”
• “[T]he contract should be interpreted in a manner which gives meaning to all its parts and in such a fashion that the provisions do not conflict with each other, if this is reasonably possible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).