· 12/11/1944
United States v. Halle Bros.
Citations
- 13 Cust. Ct. 418
- 1944 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 963
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court plainly erred in denying the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to present evidence sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction under ORS 162.385(1)(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.