United States v. Hakeem Olayinka Alli-Balogun, Also Known as Ralph Badmus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claimed error could not be plain error when the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit had not spoken on the subject and the authority in the other circuits was split
• holding that a claimed error could not be plain error when the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit had not spoken on the subject and the authority in the other circuits was split
• holding that a claimed error could not be plain error when the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit had not spoken on the subject and the authority in the other circuits was split
• explaining that a motion under § 3582(c) “is undoubtedly a step in the 10 criminal case” that “requires the [sentencing] court to reexamine the original sentence”
• requiring “particularized evidence of direct 10 or circumstantial facts” bearing on improper motive in order to resist 11 defendant’s motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).