United States v. Hairup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “that the word ‘knowingly,’ as used in § 1028A(a)(l), modifies the entire indivisible predicate: ‘transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person’ ”
• finding “that the word ‘knowingly,’ as used in § 1028A(a)(l

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).