Skip to main content
· 6/19/1969

United States v. Haifley

Citations

  • 300 F. Supp. 355
  • 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding retroactive revocation of exemption determination under sec. 501(c)(12) because taxpayer operated \in direct contradiction to the method of operation\ outlined in its request for determination, beginning almost immediately after it filed the request
  • upholding retroactive revocation of exemption determination under sec. 501 (e)(12) because taxpayer operated “in direct contradiction to the method of operation” outlined in its request for determination, beginning almost immediately after it filed the request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.