Skip to main content
· 10/7/1988

United States v. H. William Johns

Citations

  • 858 F.2d 154
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13918
  • 1988 WL 102550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that denial of a motion to dismiss based on Rule 6(e) violations was not immediately appealable under Mechanik because “the distinction between assertions of error that concern Rule 6(d) and assertions of error that concern Rule 6(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Becker, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.