Skip to main content
· 6/6/2011

United States v. H & R Block, Inc.

Citations

  • 789 F. Supp. 2d 74
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59963
  • 2011 WL 2182544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “statistics provide, at best, only a rough measure of the relative congestion of the dockets in the two districts”
  • “[T]echnological advances have significantly reduced the weight of the ease-of-access-to- proof factor.” (alteration in original
  • “[A] plaintiff’s choice of forum is ordinarily ‘a paramount consideration’ that is entitled to ‘great deference’ in the transfer inquiry.” (alteration in original) (quoting FTC v. Cephalon, Inc., 551 F. Supp. 2d 21, 26, (D.D.C. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.