Skip to main content
· 3/17/1966

United States v. H. M. Prince Textiles, Inc.

Citations

  • 262 F. Supp. 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in an action by the government to recover civil penalties “[a]ll that the government need prove is that a cease and desist order has in fact been violated”
  • “[I]t is well settled that a defendant cannot attack a final cease and desist order in a subsequent enforcement proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cannella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.