Skip to main content
· 1/7/1980

United States v. H. H. Reisman

Citations

  • 611 F.2d 325
  • 27 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,058
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disputes act should not be interpreted to require \a useless resort to administrative remedies\
  • disputes act should not be interpreted to require “a useless resort to administrative remedies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trask, Sneed, East

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.