United States v. H. G. Frost, Jr., Also Known as Jack Frost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior bad act was intrinsic consciousness-of-guilt evidence when it was “direct evidence of fraudulent intent,” an element of the charges
• holding that “direct evidence of fraudulent intent” qualified as intrinsic evidence (emphasis added)
• “Frost’s testimony is direct evidence of fraudulent intent and consciousness of guilt. It does not relate to ‘other acts,’ but rather constitutes evidence intrinsic to the overall scheme. Rule 404 is therefore inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).