· 10/5/1983
United States v. H. Bradford Aarons
Citations
- 718 F.2d 188
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the sufficiency of the evidence is properly before us, we consider that issue first because it is determinative of whether the appellant may be retried.”
- “Where the sufficiency of the evidence is properly before us, we consider that issue first because it is determinative of whether the appellant may be retried.”
- “Where the sufficiency of the evidence is properly before us, we consider that issue first because it is determinative of whether” the Double Jeopardy Clause prevents “the appellant [from] be[ing] retried.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lively, Engel, Neese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.