United States v. Guzman-Tlaseca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not this court’s job to research the law to support an appellant’s argument.” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
• “It is not this court’s job to research the law to support an appellant’s argument.” (cleaned up)
• “It is not this court’s job to research the law to support an appellant’s argument.” (cleaned up)
• “It is not this court’s job to research the law to support an appellant’s argument.”
• “It is not this court’s job to research the law to support an appellant’s argument.” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
• “It is not this court’s job to research the law to support a[] [party’s] argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).