United States v. Gustavo Colon

Oral argument

• Argued

  21 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff is precluded by the full faith and credit statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1738, from relitigating those issues which were adjudicated by a state court
• holding that the full faith and credit statute prohibits parties from relitigating issues that have been resolved by a court of competent jurisdiction
• holding that reservation of federal as-applied takings claims that have issues that are not distinct from antecedent state issues does not defeat application of collateral estoppel in later federal suit
• holding that “the Eleventh Amendment bars Fifth Amendment takings claims against States in federal court when the State’s courts remain open to adjudicate such claims.” (emphasis in original)
• holding that federal takings claims reserved in state court proceedings are subject to the principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel, and not reviewed in federal court de novo
• holding that reservation of federal as-applied takings claims that have issues that are not distinct from antecedent state issues does not defeat application of collateral estoppel in later federal suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).