United States v. Guldager

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \Rule 45 specifically confers jurisdiction on the court issuing the subpoena and that court alone\
• holding that minority shareholder could not be compelled to disclose company documents in a lawsuit against him personally, absent evidence that he was the “alter ego” of the company
• denying motion to compel defendant, president and minority shareholder of nonparty corporation, to produce nonparty corporation = s documents in suit brought against defendant in his individual capacity
• “While other judges in discovery at a time when some federal courts accepted the applicability and constitutionality of K.S.A. 60-3702(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).