United States v. Guillermo Arriagada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Any departure from the rule [Rule 43] is error and, ‘unless the record completely negatives any reasonable possibility of prejudice arising from such error,’ mandates a new trial.”
• error in reinstructing jury outside of the defendant’s presence harmless beyond a reasonable doubt when the court’s answer to the jury was in direct conformity with the court’s prior instruction given in the presence of the defendant
• “Had it appeared to the appellant or his counsel that the action of the District Court involved any prejudice, objection would have been promptly entered by the appellant and not tardily raised after verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).