United States v. Guillermo Arango

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant, by pleading guilty, waived his right to object to constitutionality of search; therefore, court properly refused to hold evidentiary hearing to determine whether evidence was seized illegally
• noting that the defendant’s guilty plea waived his right to challenge the search of his van under the Fourth Amendment
• noting that the defendant’s guilty plea waived his right to challenge the search of his van under the Fourth Amendment
• waiving claim in guilty plea that search of the defendant’s van violated the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).