United States v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a petitioner could not, as a matter of law, seek cancellation of a mark because it had entered a prior settlement agree- ment with the registrant to “not oppose or petition to cancel directly or indirectly any registration” by that registrant
• affirming grant of summary judgment dismissing opposition based upon a prior written settlement agreement that was signed by both parties
• “Since DANSHEER is not one of the marks appellee agreed not to use (paragraph 11 of the 22 Opposition Nos. @. a0. 109,471 and 109,741 S agreement
• ‘Since DANSHEER is not one of the marks appellee agreed not to use (paragraph 11 of the 22 Opposition Nos. @. a 109,471 and 109,741 S agreement
• “Since DANSHEER is not one of the marks appellee agreed not to use (paragraph 11 of the 22 Opposition Nos. Oo ar, 109,471 and 109,741 @ agreement
• ‘Since DANSHEER is not one of the marks appellee agreed not to use (paragraph 11 of the 22 Opposition Nos. @. a 109,471 and 109,741 S agreement) and appellee is not precluded from enforcing the settlement agreement, appellee is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).