United States v. Guajardo-Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court may consider the underlying conduct detailed in arrest records where there is a sufficient factual basis for the court to conclude that the conduct actually occurred
• upholding the district court’s below-guidelines sentence and determining the defendant was not prejudiced, even though two of the three arrests listed in the presentence investigation report were unreliable
• “Because the appellant did not raise these objections during the sentencing hearing, we review the decisions for plain error.”
• “Because the appellant did not raise these objections during the sentencing hearing, we review the decisions for plain er‐ ror.”
• “Because the appellant did not raise these objections during the sentencing hearing, we review the decisions for plain er‐ ror.”
• a sentencing judge may not rely on the arrest record itself in deciding a sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).