United States v. Guadalupe Soto-Camacho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There was no evidence here to suggest that the Ja-cumba Checkpoint was operated solely for the purpose of drug interdi ction, or that Soto himself was stopped, referred to secondary, or asked for permission to search his vehicle solely to look for drugs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).