United States v. Guadalupe Mejia, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] federal court may refuse to exercise continuing 4 jurisdiction even though the parties have agreed to it” and that such declination 1s adjudged 5 || by the “abuse of discretion” standard
• holding a district court may consider evidence that was rejected 4 by the Appeals Council to determine whether, in light of the record as a whole, an ALJ’s 5 decision was supported by substantial evidence and was free of legal error
• placing the burden of production on the party challenging a certification 19 under the FTCA
• “The CEA . . . regulate[s] only futures and options and never 4 spot transactions or cash forwards.”
• \a municipality may not escape liability for a § 1983 violation merely because the officer who committed the violation is entitled to qualified immunity\
• handgun in kitchen drawer next to small quantity of drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).