Skip to main content
· 1/3/1958

United States v. Grzegorczyk

Citations

  • 8 C.M.A. 571
  • 8 USCMA 571
  • 25 C.M.R. 75
  • 1958 CMA LEXIS 746
  • 1958 WL 3071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “guiding principle” is whether “in the individual circumstances” the mitigating party exercised reasonable judgment
  • holding that the “guiding principle” is whether “in the individual circumstances” the mitigating party exercised reasonable judgment
  • holding that an offset to lost profits based upon the excess value of physical plant is determined by measuring the fair market value of the plant at the time of breach
  • stating that the test is “whether, in the individual circumstances, the [plaintiff] exercised ‘reasonable commercial judgment’ . . . in the effort to mitigate damages”
  • stating that the test is “whether, in the individual circumstances, the [plaintiff] exercised ‘reasonable commercial judgment’ . . . in the effort to mitigate damages”
  • stating that the test is “whether, in the individual circumstances, the [plaintiff] exercised ‘reasonable commercial judgment’ . . . in the effort to mitigate damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Latimer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.