United States v. Grover Lamar Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an acquittal on charges of marihuana possession does not foreclose proof of any element essential to a conviction for conspiracy to distribute marihuana
• holding that filing of a second superseding indictment did not moot appeal from the dismissal of the first superseding indictment when earlier indictment remained pending
• noting that the filing of a second superseding indictment did not moot an appeal from the dismissal a first superseding indictment when the first superseding indictment was still pending
• “[A] question of the admissibility of evidence arising from the application of collateral estoppel is not an appealable order.”
• “When a fact is not necessarily determined in a former trial, the possibility that it may have been does not prevent re-examination of that issue.”
• “When a fact is not necessarily determined in a former trial, the possibility that it may have been does not prevent re-examination of that issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).