Skip to main content
· 9/2/2008

United States v. Griesbach

Citations

  • 540 F.3d 654
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18753
  • 2008 WL 4052912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, for an image to depict a lascivious exhibition, “the focus of the image must be on the genitals or the image must be otherwise sexually sugges- tive”
  • explaining that, for an image to depict a lascivious exhibition, “the focus of the image must be on the genitals or the image must be otherwise sexually sugges- tive”
  • 20-word description was sufficient to “justify an inference that a search of the defendant’s computer files would turn up pornographic images”
  • 20‐word description was sufficient to “justify an inference that a search of the defendant’s computer files would turn up pornographic images”
  • \[M]ore than mere nudity is required to make an image lascivious; the focus of the image must be on the genitals or the image must be otherwise sexually suggestive.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.