United States v. Gregory Steven Horn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two offenses were not related where they were committed weeks apart, involved different victims, and the defendant operated with an accomplice during one crime but not during the other
• holding that district court did not err in deeming previous offenses unrelated in spite of shared trial, plea hearing, and sentencing dates, the presence of the same defense counsel, and “contemporaneous treatment” of crimes by state court
• noting that prior offenses are not related merely because “they were committed to achieve a similar objective, such as the support of a drug habit”
• noting that the level of deference required by Buford is “clear error.”
• noting that the level of deference required by Buford is “clear error.”
• affirming sentence based on district court’s determination that convictions for two armed robberies in grocery store parking lots that had occurred “weeks apart” were not “related”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).