United States v. Gregory Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may find acquitted conduct by a preponder- ance of the evidence
• rejecting absence of mistake as a permissible purpose for the admission of evidence when the defendant’s “defense was not that she mistakenly thought she was selling powdered sugar instead of cocaine”
• rejecting absence of mistake as a permissible purpose for the admission of evidence when the defendant’s “defense was not that she mistakenly thought she was selling powdered sugar instead of cocaine”
• introduction of false testimony did not warrant a new trial where cross examination brought “inconsistencies in testimony to the attention of the jury”
• failure to object to the factual allegations in a presentence report waives any future objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).