Skip to main content
· 10/27/2004

United States v. Gregory R. Daniels and Susan v. Daniels

Citations

  • 387 F.3d 636
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22339
  • 2004 WL 2397334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The district court also found the motion to dismiss Count I of the indictment on statute of limitations ground moot in light of the superceding indictment.”
  • \We take this opportunity to clarify the law in this Circuit: the government need not charge a substantial tax deficiency to indict or convict under 26 U.S.C. § 7201 .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.