United States v. Gregory Pruess

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if the challenged law does not impose a burden on conduct “falling within the scope of the Second Amendment’s guarantee,” the law is valid
• recognizing legitimate public safety interest in preventing felons from possessing firearms
• rejecting desire to possess ammunition primarily for hunting purposes on the same basis
• rejecting a desire to possess ammunition primarily for hunting purposes on the same basis
• rejecting challenge to the felon-disarmament law as applied 4 We often look to First Amendment law as a guidepost for Second Amendment claims. Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 133 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc
• “We now join our sister circuits in holding that application of the felon-in-possession prohibition to allegedly non- violent felons * * * does not violate the Second Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).