Ninth Circuit· 7/9/2018
United States v. Gregory Obendorf
Citations
- 894 F.3d 1094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “we will affirm” the district court’s evidentiary ruling “unless the erroneous evidentiary ruling more likely than not affected the verdict”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1985-05-17· cited 408×
- Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Mercury Interactive Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 341×
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoNinth Circuit· 1976-08-19· cited 295×
- Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1998-04-10· cited 226×
- United States v. Fred S. PangNinth Circuit· 2004-03-30· cited 154×
- United States v. DecoudNinth Circuit· 2006-08-01· cited 98×
- United States v. Gabriel BucherNinth Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 41×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ethelbert Chibuike ANI, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1998-02-18· cited 36×
- United States v. BibbinsNinth Circuit· 2011-04-20· cited 18×
- United States v. AdamsFifth Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 16×
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Gerald A. HendersonNinth Circuit· 2001-03-22· cited 14×
- United States v. Douglas Crooked ArmNinth Circuit· 2015-06-08· cited 13×
- M.J. Farms, Ltd. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceW.D. Louisiana· 2008-12-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.