United States v. Gregory L. Latney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant’s knowledge was an element of one of the charged offenses “and hence [was] a fact of ‘consequence’ at his trial” (quoting FED. R. EVID. 401)
• declining to adopt a special rule for subsequent acts but observing that “the strength of the evidence is a different matter than its relevancy”
• “Given [defendant’s] involvement in the crack cocaine trade in May 1995, it was less likely that he was merely a bystander in the September 1994 transaction . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).