Skip to main content
· 5/31/2002

United States v. Gregory Golyansky Leonid Golyansky Dmitriy Baravik Almaz Corporation, Doing Business as Abc Loan Company

Citations

  • 291 F.3d 1245
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10561
  • 2002 WL 1155383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court should consider (1) the reasons the government delayed producing requested materials, including whether the government acted in bad faith; (2) the extent of prejudice to the defendant as a result of the delay; and (3
  • explaining that late productions can cause “unfair surprise”
  • explaining that late productions can cause “unfair surprise”
  • listing these factors for a trial court to consider in selecting a sanction for the government’s discovery violation: (1) the reasons for the government’s actions, including whether it acted intentionally or in bad faith; (2) the degree of prejudice; and (3
  • “To support a finding of prejudice, the court must determine that the [discovery disclosure] delay impacted the defendant’s ability to prepare or present its case.”
  • “potential Brady/Giglio information” held to include information regarding a “witness’ serious mental health issues” triggering prosecutor’s “affirmative duty to disclose the information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Baldock, Alley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.