United States v. Gregory Darnell Gillis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the officers’ knowledge “at the time of the search” is the relevant inquiry
• explaining that the officers’ knowledge “at the time of the search” is the relevant inquiry
• noting the district court’s finding that a co-occupant had common authority though she did not have keys to the residence’s exterior doors
• finding apparent authority even when the consenting girlfriend had two residences and the defendant changed the locks on the exterior doors of the searched house
• finding the defendant’s girlfriend had apparent authority in part because she was able to provide a detailed description of the searched house
• finding the defendant’s girlfriend had apparent authority even though she no longer lived at the residence and did not have keys because she maintained access and visited the home from time to time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).