United States v. Gregorio Machado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be inequitable to return the fruits of the movant’s crimes to the movant
• stating that the defendant’s Rule 41(g) motion, filed after the six-year limitations period expired, “had been rendered legally unpalatable by the passage of time.”
• seeking return of property seized in connection with defendant’s money laundering scheme
• amendments made after the entry of the preliminary forfeiture order become final upon entry of final forfeiture order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).