United States v. Greene Berry Mullens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant initiated the bargaining process with the police and Secret Service
• in confession suppression hearing, defendant’s testimony rebutting police testimony about the voluntariness of defendant’s confession could not “later be used against [defendant] at trial”; citing Simmons
• in confession suppression hearing, defendant's testimony rebutting police testimony about the voluntariness of defendant's confession could not \later be used against (defendant) at trial\; citing Simmons
• under Simmons, defendant could have testified during suppression hearing without risk that anything he there said could later be used against him at trial
• under Simmons, defendant could have testified during suppression hearing without risk that anything he there said could later be used against him at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).