United States v. Great American Ins. Co. of Ny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Commerce's rescission of an administrative review of an antidumping order removed suspension of liquidation of subject entries
• “Language explicitly stating-that a suspension is removed is not required to remove a suspension of liquidation.”
• repeatedly attaching grammatical ownership of the term “entry” to the names of various exporters even though none acted as the importer of record
• “Without a fact-specific demonstration of injury to an interest that the notice provisions were designed to protect, the court cannot conclude that [the surety] has pled with'particularity the prejudice suffered by the lack of notice.’’
• “Termination is not a legal option for [a single transaction bond] surety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).