United States v. Grayson Tackett Linda Tackett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Section 2J1.2(b)(2) enhancement based upon inference of substantiality and stating that evidence in the record corroborated the inference
• defendants’ dishonesty in attempting to obstruct their son’s arson trial resulted in the expenditure of government resources to charge the son with the additional offense of obstruction
• inference of substantiality supported because defendants were sole source of knowledge of falsity; record also showed that truthful testimony by defendants would have changed the course of investigation of the underlying events

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).