United States v. Grams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \greater clarity [on the part of the sentencing judge] in open court would have aided our appellate review\
• reasoning that “the same facts and analyses can, at times, be used to justify both a Guidelines departure and a variance”
• stating that \the district court should still have stated in open court whether it adopted in part or full the sentencing range and factual findings suggested by the probation office\ because \greater clarity in open court would have aided our appellate review\
• remanding for resentencing based, in part, on the district court's failure to explain whether it departed or varied from the defendant's suggested Guidelines range
• stating that “the district court should still have stated in open court whether it adopted in part or full the sentencing range and factual findings suggested by the probation office” because “greater clarity in open court would have aided our appellate review”
• stressing that both \considerations were satisfied\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).