United States v. Gossi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming the view it had expressed in an earlier case that “[t]he purpose of restitution is twofold: (1) to restore the defrauded party to the position he would have had absent the fraud [citation omitted] (2
• “we reject [the defendant’s] argument that we should look to the advisory Sentencing Guidelines for calculating the victim’s losses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).