United States v. Goodwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our superior court has held that violations of Article 16, UCMJ, are not jurisdictional, so long as there is “substantial compliance” with its requirements. Thus, such errors must be tested for prejudice.”
• “Our superior court has held that violations of Article 16, UCMJ, are not jurisdictional, so long as there is ‘substantial compliance’ with its re- quirements. Thus, such errors must be tested for prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Caudill
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2007-09-11· cited 2×
• United States v. Edginton
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2014-04-30
• United States v. Marrero-Alvarez
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-04-26
• United States v. Adad
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2021-02-09
• United States v. Enciso
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2022-09-15
• United States v. Miholerwortinger
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2022-04-29
• United States v. PANTOVICH
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2024-01-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Turner
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-09-30· cited 28×
• United States v. Mayfield
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-09-27· cited 26×
• United States v. Townes
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-03-08· cited 19×
• United States v. Mark
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-09-12· cited 17×
• United States v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-08-01· cited 12×
• United States v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-04-28· cited 11×
• United States v. Seward
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1998-09-30· cited 10×