United States v. Good Neighbor Imports, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the challenged testimony does not qualify for plain error review because, to decide the issue, we would have to choose between competing inferences about whether defendant made a conscious decision not to object to the testimony”
• failure to object to vouching evidence from the victim’s mother on a collateral issue where criminal trial counsel later used the vouching testimony in cross-examination of the vouching witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).