Skip to main content
· 7/14/1995

United States v. Gonzalo Pereira-Munoz

Citations

  • 59 F.3d 788
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17026
  • 1995 WL 413137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying standard of objective reasonableness and holding that officer’s actual state of mind is irrelevant for purposes of determining lawfulness of stop
  • failure to provide truthful identity hampered preparation of the presentence report and precluded determination as to criminal history
  • “[s]o long as the officer is doing nothing more than he is legally permitted and objectively authorized to do, his actual state of mind is irrelevant” for purposes of determining stop’s lawfulness
  • “if the .officer is doing that which he is legally permitted to do and objectively authorized to do, his state of mind is irrelevant for purposes of determining the lawfulness of the stop”
  • “[s]o long as the officer is doing nothing more than he is legally permitted and objectively authorized to do, his actual state of mind is irrelevant” for purposes of determining stop’s lawfulness
  • applying reasonable suspicion standard to support further detention and investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Friedman, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.