United States v. Gonzalez-Reyna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “considerations of judicial economy counsel, as a general matter, against investment of court resources in proceedings that may prove to have been unnecessary”
• noting that “considerations of judicial economy counsel, as a general matter, against investment of court resources in proceedings that may prove to have been unnecessary”
• conditioning stay of discovery pending resolution of defendant’s appeal on defendant applying to the Second Circuit for an expedited briefing schedule
• staying discovery pending appeal and finding the “potential loss” of the right “to avoid the far greater expenses and other burdens attendant on class litigation (or even class- wide arbitration)” to be “cognizable” harm
• “The first two questions — addressing likely success and irreparable harm to the movant — are the most salient concerns.”
• “First, considerations of judicial economy counsel, as a general matter, against investment of court resources in proceedings that may prove to have been unnecessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).