United States v. Gomez-Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that knowledge can be inferred reasonably based on ordinary human experience for which no special proof is required, and that the trier of fact can rely on common sense
• stating that “knowledge can be inferred reasonably based on ordinary human experience for which no special proof is required; a trier of fact can rely on common sense”
• “[T]his list of examples [offered by the Supreme Court in Flores-Figueroa] does not foreclose the possibility of proving knowledge in a more difficult case.”
• \[T]his list of examples [offered by the Supreme Court in Flores-Figueroa ] does not foreclose the possibility of proving knowledge in a more difficult case.\
• “Our decision in [Holmes] establishes that the government can rely on circumstantial evidence about an offender’s misuse of a victim’s identity to prove the offender knew the identity belonged to a real person.” (emphasis added)
• \Our decision in [ Holmes ] establishes that the government can rely on circumstantial evidence about an offender's misuse of a victim's identity to prove the offender knew the identity belonged to a real person.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).