United States v. Gomes Fontes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant did not challenge the courtʹs underlying factual determinations and implying that, had he done so, the court would have had jurisdiction under § 3742(a)
• affirming consideration of predisposition evidence in determining whether the government's conduct was \extreme and outrageous\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).