United States v. Goldberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an intention to be ... bound [in future litigations] should not be readily inferred”
• \[A]n issue is not `actually litigated' for purposes of collateral estoppel unless the parties to the stipulation manifest an intent to be bound in a subsequent action.\
• “an intention to be ... bound [in future litigations] should not be readily inferred”
• “As a general rule ... an issue is not ‘actually litigated’ for purposes of collateral estoppel unless the parties to the stipulation manifest an intent to be bound in a subsequent action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).