United States v. Gloria Claros and Vidolfo Satizabal, Appeal of John R. Deleon and Joseph R. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating and remanding where “we cannot discern from the record before us the standard [applied by] the district court . . . .”
• explaining facts that prisoner was pro se, the prison was 18 “missing a handful of reporter volumes,” and the plaintiff was reliant “on helpers who were 19 transferred or too busy to attend to his petitions” were not extraordinary circumstances
• dicta noting disinclination to assume that local rule assessing monetary sanctions required finding of bad faith, recklessness or wilful misconduct
• court may order counsel to pay jury costs as sanction for negligent failure to timely appear at trial
• court may order counsel to pay jury costs as a sanction for negligent failure to appear timely at trial
• “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate if no reasonable juror 18 could find substantial similarity of ideas and expression”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).