United States v. Glenn Wellman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding conviction because \the proof in this case removes any doubt regarding the nature of the scheme\ as one to obtain money
• upholding conviction because “the proof in this case removes any doubt regarding the nature of the scheme” as one to obtain money
• jury required to find that defendant devised scheme “to defraud another of something of value”
• in scheme in which defendant sold tanks as meeting federal standards but which in fact did not, deprivation of \property\ could be the money that the victim spent on purchasing the tanks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).